Seminar: Economics of Conflict and Conflict Resolution

Last taught in summer 2019.

Course description

| Tentative Syllabus | Summer 2019 | Page updated: 17 July 2019 |
| Faculty of Economics | EBA Program | Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand |

Course ID: 2952418 - Seminar: Economics of Conflict and Conflict Resolution: Managing a whole country is difficult. Internal factions of interest groups need to be dealt with. Revolts and uprisings can arise. Rebels threaten established powers, as do terror organizations. Mass atrocities and genocides can and do occur, perhaps in neighboring countries whose refugees now stream to your country. Military alliances with other countries may need to be built, maintained, or changed, and general competition and cooperation with other countries occupy leaders' time. In the midst of peace and security challenges such as these, an economy has to be run, the well-being of the population has to be looked after, and the natural environment to be protected. In a word, a lot of conflict potential needs to be managed and actual conflict resolved. What do economists know about the causes, conduct, and consequences of conflict? How can our thinking help to make the world more peaceful?

Instead of providing lecture-style answers, this seminar uses the "flipped" or "inverted" classroom method. This means that students read, present, discuss, and learn from each other while the teacher listens and intervenes only as necessary to keep the class on track toward the overall course goal, following a well-defined syllabus of readings. You will examine concepts, theory, and evidence to cover an extensive range of topics. You will use theory drawn from standard (neoclassical) economic theory, behavioral economics, social economics, and political economy, and you will examine associated statistical evidence.

You can expect to make at least one readings-based presentation each week to the other students. The presentations make up one-half (that is, 50%) of your course grade. The other students will grade the quality of your presentations, and you will grade the other students. If you do not teach and learn from each other, your grade will be low. Therefore, you should be highly confident that you can learn how to make compelling, informative presentations. Your spoken English need not be perfect, but your attitude to learning (more) English must be perfect. We will have sessions to discuss presentation criteria and how best to present. The other half (50%) of your course grade is based on an applied paper which you will research and write. Again, your written English need not be perfect but you should be able to express thoughts clearly, simply, and logically.

Note: Names of enrolled students who are not present on the first day of class will be deleted from the class list. All students are expected to be precisely on time for each day of class.

Course details

Seminar time/rooms: Mon & Wed 1-4pm (Mahit 601); Fri 1-4pm (TBA)

Seminar size: The class size is limited to 25 students, to be split into two sections: 1-2:15pm and 2:30-3:45pm.

Office room/hours: Mahit 208/1.1 (Mon & Wed 4-5pm) | Email: ajarn [dot] jurgen [at] gmail [dot] com.

Academic honesty, class attendance, and expected classroom behavior: Please refer to the relevant university policies. Academic dishonesty is not tolerated and results in expulsion from class, a failing grade, and reporting to the university authorities. This includes cheating, ghostwriting, plagiarism, or other forms of dishonesty on any other assigned work. Classroom behavior that permits unimpeded exchange of academically relevant ideas and views is expected. Turn off cell phones or other electronic devices and put them out of sight. I have only one rule: You cannot come late, you cannot leave early, and for the duration of class you must be 100% alert. I expect students' personal conduct to be courteous, professional, and business-like at all times.

Assignments and grading:

Research paper (50%): Scroll down to the bottom of this page to see the details. An outline & initial draft is due at the beginning of the midterm period. The finished paper is due at the beginning of the final exam period. You must email me PDF files of well-prepared copies of your draft and finished papers, with your name, nickname, and Chula student ID clearly stated on the front page.

Participation (50%) : One half of your course grade comes from class attendance, presentations, and critical thinking-oriented participation, 30 percentage points of which are based on two peer evaluations (15% each) of your contributions to the seminar (one at midterm, one at the final exam time period). The other 20 percentage points come from my evaluation of your contributions. "Class attendance and participation" means never to be late to class, never to leave early, never to play with your cell phone or other electronic devices, never to let your class mates down; it means to volunteer with eagerness to make class presentations, to share findings and information, to summarize the readings, and to think and rethink how the readings "hang together" so that you can build a mental map of the field of conflict and peace economics. [Copy of the Peer Evaluation Form here].

Grading scale: 90% = A; 85%+ = B+; 80% = B; 75%+ = C+; 70% = C; 65%+ = D+; 60% = D; <60% = F.

Textbook: Anderton and Carter. Principles of Conflict Economics. 2nd edition. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2019.

Readings: A username and password for the readings listed below will be provided in class. All materials are copyright protected. As a courtesy to you, you may use them for study in this class but you may not distribute any of the files to anyone else. Legally, you are expected to respect copyright law. Morally, you are expected to respect the authors' and publishers' work.

Tentative class schedule and syllabus: See details below. Always check to see if there are updated a/o new materials posted.

Course evaluation: At the conclusion of the course, use your Chula usn/pws to log in to https://www.cas.chula.ac.th/cas and complete the course evaluation for this seminar course (course code: 2952418).

Special note: No EBA student is excluded from the course. However, your English language skills (including and especially confidence regarding your spoken English) should be above the average for EBA students. The reason for this is that this course revolves around public speaking in class.

Week 1

Mon 3 June (Econ Bldg 411)

- Overview: The multiple purposes of the course

- Peer evaluation form [here]

- Discussion: Economics and conflict

- Readings: (1) Summarize (a condensed repetition/rehearsal for an exam question), (2) contextualize, contrast, & compare, and (3) evaluate

- Assignment: Research paper. Apply conflict and peace economics to a real-world situation (scroll down to see details)


Wed 5 June (Mahit 601)

- Discussion: How to present, and with what purpose

=> Passive learning: Listening to (1) content (intellectual) and (2) delivery (emotional)

=> Active learning: Learner must (3) do something (e.g., presenting; Q&A; small "assignments")

- Presentation criteria; presentation skills list [here]; duties of the audience; discussion of peer evaluation criteria

- Demonstration (Boulding's spatial model of conflict) [20 min.] [pptx] [pdf]

- Random assignment to presentation/speaking slots for the summer term

- Ajarn Jurgen: Summing up and tasks for the next session

Week 2

Mon 10 June (Mahit 601)

Readings, presentations, discussion: Economics of conflict

- Text: Ch. 1.1 - 1.3 (definitions, data, etc.) [15 min.]

- Text: Ch. 1.4 (interdependencies, method of study) [15 min.]

- Paper: Brauer (2017); Anderton and Brauer (2019) [30 min.]

- Ajarn Jurgen: Summing up and tasks for the next session


Wed 12 June (Mahit 601)

Readings, presentations, discussion: Macro- and microeconomics

- Text: Ch. 2 (Macroecon: PPF and econ growth) [20 min.]

- Text: Ch. 3 (Microecon: demand and supply; include section 3.4) [20 min.]

- Text: Chs. 2 & 3: Create your own applications [20 min.]

- Ajarn Jurgen: Summing up and tasks for the next session


Fri 14 June (Econ Bldg 410)

Readings, presentations, and discussion: Rational choice, constrained optimization model

- Text: Ch. 4.1 & 4.2 (background theory) [20 min.]

- Text: Ch. 4.3 (1+1 applications: 1 in the text plus one you invent) [20 min.]

- Text: Ch. 4.3 (1+1 applications; 1 in the text plus one you invent) [20 min.]

- Ajarn Jurgen: Summing up and tasks for the next session

Week 3

Mon 17 June (Mahit 601)

Readings, presentations, discussion: Classic game theory

- Text: Ch. 5.1 & 5.2, with application[20 min.]

- Text: Ch. 5.3 & 5.4, with application [20 min.]

- Paper: Verwimp (2004) [20 min.]

- Ajarn Jurgen: Summing up and tasks for the next session


Wed 19 June 2017 (Mahit 601)

Readings, presentations, discussion: Behavioral and identity economics

- Text: Ch. 6.1 & 6.2, with application(behavioral econ) [20 min.]

- Text: Ch. 6.3 & 6.4, with application (identity econ) [20 min.]

- Paper: Glaeser (2005) [20 min.]

- Ajarn Jurgen: Summing up and tasks for the next session

Week 4

Mon 24 June (Mahit 601) [midterm date]

Readings, presentation, discussion: Network economics

- Peer evaluation #1 due

- Draft of research paper due

- Text: Ch. 7.1 & 7.2, suggest application (key concepts & outcomes) [20 min.]

- Text: Ch. 7.3 & 7.4, with application [20 min.]

- Paper: Anderton and Brauer (2019; JGR paper under review) [20 min.]

- Ajarn Jurgen: Summing up and tasks for the next session


Wed 26 June (Mahit 601)

Readings, presentations, discussion: Conflict success functions and appropriation theory

- Text: Ch. 8.1 & 8.2 (key concepts and settlement opportunities) [30 min.]

- Text: Ch. 8.3 (appropriation and the Edgeworth box) [30 min.]

- Ajarn Jurgen: Summing up and tasks for the next session

Week 5

Mon 1 July (Mahit 601)

Readings, presentations, discussion: Bargaining theory of war and peace

- Text: Ch. 10.1 - 10.4 (bargaining model setup but focus on 10.3/10.4, rationalist and nonrationalist sources of violence) [25 min.]

- Text: Ch. 10.5 (sources of peace in the bargaining model) [25 min.]

- Paper: Wood (2018) [10 min.]

- Ajarn Jurgen: Summing up and tasks for the next session


Wed 3 July (Mahit 601)

Readings, presentations, discussion: Inter- and intrastate war

- Text: Ch. 11 (definition; patterns; theory; evidence; consequences) [20 min.]

- Text: Ch. 12 (definition; patterns; theory; evidence; consequences) [20 min.]

- Figure 12.4 replication for other countries [20 min.]

- Ajarn Jurgen: Summing up and tasks for the next session

Fri 5 July (Econ Bldg 412)

Readings, presentations, discussion: Terrorism and counterterrorism

- Text: Ch. 13.3 (3 models, RCM, GT, and network models) [30 min.]

- Reading: Counterterrorism: Enders and Sandler (2012, ch. 4) [30 min.]

- Ajarn Jurgen: Summing up and tasks for the next session

Week 6

Mon 8 July (Mahit 601)

Readings, presentations, discussion: Mass atrocities and genocides

- Text: Ch. 14.1, 14.2, & 14.3 (definition, patterns, actors) [15 min.]

- Text: Ch. 14.4 (RCM and behavioral econ applications) [15 min.]

- Text: Ch. 14.5 (CGT and EGT applications) [15 min.]

- Text: Ch. 14.6 (pp. 312-313; network models applications) [15 min.]

- Ajarn Jurgen: Summing up and tasks for the next session


Wed 10 July (Mahit 601)

Readings, presentations, discussion: Arms rivalry, proliferation, and arms control

- Text: Ch. 15.3 (Richardson model) [spreadsheet for ch. 15.3 [here]) [20 min.]

- Text: Ch. 15.4 (Intriligator-Brito model) [40 min.]

- Ajarn Jurgen: Summing up and tasks for the next session

Week 7

Mon 15 July (Mahit 601)

Readings, presentations, discussion: Security alliances

- Text: Ch. 16.3/Fig. 16.3 (Olson-Zeckhauser model) [20 min.]

- Text (Ch. 16.3/Figs. 16.4-16.7 (Reaction functions) [20 min.]

- Ajarn Jurgen: Transboundary and transgenerational challenges [here] [20 min.]

- Ajarn Jurgen: Summing up and tasks for the next session


Thu 18 July (Mahit 601) [final exam date]

- Peer evaluation #2 due

- Research paper due

Readings, presentations, discussion: Peace economics

- Ajarn Jurgen: An overview [here]

- Text: Ch. 17 (Peace)

- Paper: Brauer and Dunne (2012, ch. 5: Minimal conditions for stable peace) (2012) [20 min.]


Research paper

Your research paper is an application of conflict and peace economics to a topic of your choice, but one that is not covered in the textbook or readings. In the past, students have examined topics as diverse as a comparison of differences in the northern and southern violent conflicts in Thailand, the connection between violent conflict in Israel/Palestine and the Israeli housing market, and the degree to which concepts of peace economics apply to the case of the United States between independence in 1776 and its civil war of 1861-65. So long as your paper in on conflict/peace and economics (not politics, for instance), it will be on target. The paper MUST be data-based.

Format: typed, double-spaced with 1 inch margins, 12-type font (Times New Roman), no extra spacing between paragraphs. Length: 4-6,000 words of text. You should have a list of references of between 5 to 10 items, following a proper citation format. (An example of a style sheet to follow is [here].) The paper length requirement is exclusive of title page, figure(s), tables (if any), and list of references. Order: title page, text, endnotes (if any), references, figure(s) and tables (if any), and appendices (if any). For background literature, the following web sites may be helpful: EPSJ, RePEc, NBER, SSRN, HiCN ( and EconLit if you have access). Quote (or paraphrase) and cite. DO NOT PLAGIARIZE (which, in scholarship, is a deadly sin and results in a course grade of "F").

Potential data sources: Apart from sources listed in the Anderton/Carter (2019) text, here are some dataset web sites: Armed Conflict Location and Event Data (ACLED), Peace Research Institute Oslo (PRIO), Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI), Political Instability Task Force (PITF), Center for Systemic Peace (CSP), Global Terrorism Database (GTD), Correlates of War (COW), Global Peace Index and Positive Peace Index (GPI). You are welcome to search for and make use of additional data sites (including, of course, the Penn World Table, World Bank, IMF, and UN for general economic data). Note how carefully charts and tables are constructed in the Anderton/Carter text and in the readings: There are headings and subheadings, units of measurement, and source identification for example as well as careful definitions in the text material. The charts and tables are well-formated and presented. Do not copy/paste other people's charts or tables. The point of the exercise is for you to construct charts and tables yourself and then proceed with your analysis.

Paper structure: Structure your paper approximately as follows:

  • 10%: Introduction [overview, context, main thesis, main findings]

  • 80%: Main text

  • 10%: Conclusion [note that a conclusion is NOT a summary]

Paper assessment: Your paper will be graded on content (e.g., literature collection, sound analysis) and on how well it is written (e.g., concise statements, logical constructions, no misspellings, no grammatical errors, etc.).

When writing your paper you may find it useful to ask the following questions:

1. Do the opening paragraphs contain a clear description of what the paper is focusing on and do they contain a clearly stated research question?

2. Does each paragraph have a main point that justifies the paragraph’s presence in the paper?

3. Do the paragraphs follow in a logical order?

4. Does the conclusion follow from the material presented in the paper?

5. Are your arguments supported by examples, graphs, and/or data or are you offering weakly supported opinions?

6. Does your use of economic concepts and models strengthen the paper or is it used just for the sake of including a model?

7. Is the paper marred by misspellings, errors in syntax, poorly chosen words, or excessive quotations?

8. Are references presented in a proper and consistent format?

9. Does the paper show clear insight and careful thought?

10. Has the paper gone through multiple drafts and has the final draft been proofread?


Thank you to Prof. Charles H. Anderton for this set of questions.